Santacroce, learn more about the label (the Zanichelli)!
I can not write well, but I want to write. Read the his book. I arrived in the middle but I still dare to give an opinion because I like the strange feeling that so much I have read so far read to the end. Everybody was talking, you are mitered on the one hand to defend the possibility of a person to express his ideas, as licenses are, on the other standing up to moralizing, if we make the bonfire of your pages. I laugh in your face, personally, to both of them.
fact I have not yet figured out where it is dirty. Zooerastia, coprophagy, sodomy, orgies, and murders are things that every adult male in good health, physical and mental, known since the age of puberty due to the bevy of porn material enjoyed in his spare time. This is so trite that you read, you do not not rise either. One has the feeling of knowing what will happen the next page, so these acclaimed twelve months seem to be the bad copy a porn series B.
Where are the license, the destruction of all morality, the fog and the subversion of every order? What you do, others before you have said and done. Pleasure D'Annunzio read today makes you smile when you consider that the time was a scandalous book. This book read next year will make you laugh, the faster the decline of the customs and is now so saturated the market for perversion. Isa, take a walk on rotten, you will realize that the things that were already obs viemmediciotto stories in the days of Boniface VIII. Or at least, if you have strange fantasies, let me know.
We live in a society where the perversions are growing at a furious rate: people love to get shit in your mouth, be put under vacuum, get in incellofanare Domopak, and loves to suffer for centuries and impose the strangeness of which you speak ... really believe that sane people are scandalizzino for 'ste four cows? What would make me vomit, exactly? It's funny, but scandalo.Cosa should be, perhaps the young age of the characters who do things Turkish? It would be nice to make a movie of your book and see how the public reacts ... you should look for a fourteen year old willing to viemmediciotto of meanness. Do you really think it would be difficult to find ?
And then you do not know Italian! You say in an interview (in a nutshell) that you think primary schools are the only cycle of education that makes sense to exist: they teach you to write letters to form words to compose sentences. Now, I fully support this idea, because I see it as a way of saying "Watch out, learn the basics everything else is useless superstructure" (perhaps a way to proclaim your loyalty to the Earth, so dear to you of Nietzsche?). But hell, you can not scratch so bad after! You have taught or not, that between subject and predicate is never the point? Unfortunately so do the kids much younger Desdemona ... To which you could quote me, as well as Nietzsche, Bataille and whomever else, some famous examples of contravention of this rule. So fine, let's move on.
You have certainly taught us that in fact the words starting with pn and ps want the article. You have taught us, yes? Page 207, and soon after 211. And in those parts, do the same "mistake" with the word "tire". But already, the story is telling us a girl who speaks deliquiescenze complex task of language, changing the grammar, fun to create a new syntax . You also did it on purpose then this error?
you have (I hope) pointed out that you're a drug addict dell'anastrofe. Heck, even where they can put it stylistically horrible. Everything is fine, but what you wrote seems truly born of a fourteen, or Yoda ... This also is wanted? Some found
are undoubtedly intelligent, I'm telling you this to let you know that my opinion is not only a destruens pars. It 's a fine choice set the story in the Victorian era that might be, but at the same time suggest that the characters have modern knowledge in science (chemical amusing descriptions of the effects of drugs). The decision not to insert any speeches or direct numbers in figures is very Tabucchi, but burdens the speech without reason. For a case (s?) I accidentally on the table also Eco's Pendulum and I'm reading. Write the same way in the end, only that you exaggerate, radicalising than those that pre-register him are natural choices. I think yours is the first example of the pleonasm pleonasm ...
