are no use to post videos, but.
Remove the top-hat, for god, remove the top-hat.
: O
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Renal Stone Ureterovesical
Jojo's Bizarre Adventures
are no use to post videos, but.
Remove the top-hat, for god, remove the top-hat.
: O
are no use to post videos, but.
Remove the top-hat, for god, remove the top-hat.
: O
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Are Flucloxacillin Used For Chest Infections
killyourbuddha @ 2008-05-18T00: 42:00
My memory has stumbled into a dream about you. I see you again as I saw that morning in November, you were running came in a large hall with you in that suddenly had emptied, as the stars in the sky suddenly become dim in comparison to the light of the sun woke up too late , I still liked it and I know you like to nap with Gatteschi especially when it rains like today, round and big drops that water the fields and make a mockery of this asphalt swollen. You arrived with his hair still wet (not rain, as everyone has thought about it but to hurry ... shampoo is fine, but there are rituals that must be respected in the morning!), And at that moment you are my life seem, that that even if you write with a capital letter is always something bigger. You were for me the image of Mother Earth. Serena and stable, huge and very light, I imagined lay his bare foot on the concrete and then a flower suddenly crumble into pieces on the concrete. I imagine you sip carefully the things that touch, because you know that what comes in contact with you comes out more beautiful, more real, more meaningful. As a new Queen Midas, but the gold turns into something that is even more precious ... With so much violent
sweetness is requiring me to your presence makes me look ridiculous by trying to pack our nature in a flower bed. The scent of balsam of your hair, so blacks, so many, so rich to do the pale circle of Giotto, I still cherish as one of the most exciting memories I have of you.
I dreamed the same strength even in this day of April, you were gonna put a big colorful flowers you loved (and even liked me, I struggle to find someone who is not liked). That morning the sun had almost seemed a favorite you want to enlighten you in particular, that you already Didst thou appear supported by the lightweight material they are made of butterfly wings. It could be even more black humor, saying goodbye was saving, it was as dissolving a drop of ink in a vast ocean, quiet, green color that has just peace.
Now you are far away. Are you happy, knowing this is enough to appease my every thought nostalgic. Do you remember how we broke up? One day, I said, shyly mumbling these feelings-I see you (and yes, it is not an assumption or a hope, one day this will happen), and after we greeted myself and again purified of every weight, I'll tell you those exact words: "You see? I grew up for you, I became what you taught me to be. One day you'll give your name to a major star, and at that point will be made, as will be able to make free telephone calls at any time. I Just look up to heaven and say, at least for the next five hundred million years I find my North. "
My memory has stumbled into a dream about you. I see you again as I saw that morning in November, you were running came in a large hall with you in that suddenly had emptied, as the stars in the sky suddenly become dim in comparison to the light of the sun woke up too late , I still liked it and I know you like to nap with Gatteschi especially when it rains like today, round and big drops that water the fields and make a mockery of this asphalt swollen. You arrived with his hair still wet (not rain, as everyone has thought about it but to hurry ... shampoo is fine, but there are rituals that must be respected in the morning!), And at that moment you are my life seem, that that even if you write with a capital letter is always something bigger. You were for me the image of Mother Earth. Serena and stable, huge and very light, I imagined lay his bare foot on the concrete and then a flower suddenly crumble into pieces on the concrete. I imagine you sip carefully the things that touch, because you know that what comes in contact with you comes out more beautiful, more real, more meaningful. As a new Queen Midas, but the gold turns into something that is even more precious ... With so much violent
sweetness is requiring me to your presence makes me look ridiculous by trying to pack our nature in a flower bed. The scent of balsam of your hair, so blacks, so many, so rich to do the pale circle of Giotto, I still cherish as one of the most exciting memories I have of you.
I dreamed the same strength even in this day of April, you were gonna put a big colorful flowers you loved (and even liked me, I struggle to find someone who is not liked). That morning the sun had almost seemed a favorite you want to enlighten you in particular, that you already Didst thou appear supported by the lightweight material they are made of butterfly wings. It could be even more black humor, saying goodbye was saving, it was as dissolving a drop of ink in a vast ocean, quiet, green color that has just peace.
Now you are far away. Are you happy, knowing this is enough to appease my every thought nostalgic. Do you remember how we broke up? One day, I said, shyly mumbling these feelings-I see you (and yes, it is not an assumption or a hope, one day this will happen), and after we greeted myself and again purified of every weight, I'll tell you those exact words: "You see? I grew up for you, I became what you taught me to be. One day you'll give your name to a major star, and at that point will be made, as will be able to make free telephone calls at any time. I Just look up to heaven and say, at least for the next five hundred million years I find my North. "
Sunday, April 6, 2008
πωληση Monster Energy
Geburah
"Pim, there are the archetypes, is the body. Inside the belly is nice, because there the child grows, it puts your bird happy and everything goes down the food tastes good, and so are the beautiful and important cave, the ravine, the tunnel, the underground, and even the maze that is made like our good and holy tripe, and when someone has to invent something important it does come from there, why did you come from there too the day that you were born, and fertility is always a hole where something before it rots and then here is there a Chinese guy, a date, a baobab tree. But the top is better than down, because if you're upside down you are the blood to the head because your feet smell and my hair not because it is better to climb a tree to gather fruit finish ground to fatten the worms, because you rarely get hurt by touching the top (you have to be right in the attic) and usually you get hurt falling down , which is why the top is angelic and diabolical down. But as is also true what I said before on my tummy, are true and both, it's nice to bottom and inside, in a sense, and another is looking up and out, and there ' Mercury enters the spirit of contradiction and the universal. The fire keeps you warm and the cold makes you bronchopneumonia, especially if you are a clever than four years ago, and then the fire under mysterious, even why do you cook the chicken. But the cold keeps the same chicken and the fire if you touch it makes you a blister so big, so if you think one thing that has survived for millennia, like wisdom, you have to think on a mountain top (and we saw that is good), but in a cave (which is just as well) and the eternal cold of the Tibetan snow (which is fine). And if you want to know why the wisdom from the East and not from the Swiss Alps, is because the body of your ancestors in the morning when he awoke it was still dark, he looked to the east, hoping that this becomes the sun and not rain, Government thief .
"Yes, Mother."
"Certainly yes, my child. The sun is good because it is good for the body, and why has the good sense to reappear each day, then returns all that is good, not what goes and goes and who we have seen we have seen. The most convenient way to return from where it passed without redoing the same way twice is walking in circles. And since the only animal that is curled in a circle is the serpent, that's why so many cults and myths of the snake, because it is difficult to represent the return of the sun rolling a hippopotamus. Also, if you need to do a ceremony to summon the sun, you'll want to move in a circle, because if you move in a straight line away from home and the ceremony would be brief, and barks part of the circle is the structure is most convenient for a ritual, and so do those who ate fire in the squares, because everyone sees the same circle so that the person at the center, while if an entire tribe put in a straight line as a team of soldiers, the most would not see far, and that's why the circle and the cyclic motion and the return are fundamental to every religion and every ritual. "
" Yes mom. "
" Of course. And now for the magic numbers so fond of your authors. One is you're not two, one is that your affarino there, one is my affarina here and some are the nose and the heart and then see how many important things are one. And two are the eyes, ears, nostrils, my breasts and your balls, legs, arms and buttocks. Three is the most magical of all because our body does not know it, we do not have anything that is three things, and should be a mysterious number that we attribute to God, wherever we live. but if you think about it, I have one little thing and you have only one little thing - is' shut up and do spirit - and if we put these two together is Cosini out a new little thing and we become three. But then it takes a professor to find out that all peoples have ternary structures, Trinity, and the like? But religions were not the mica with the computer, it was all good people, that the purpose as they should, and all facilities are not a Trinitarian mystery, are the story of what you do, of what they did. But two arms and two legs are four, four and here is the same as a good number, especially if you think that animals have four legs and four legs are young children, known as the Sphinx. Five not talk about, are the fingers of the hand, and with two hands you have that other sacred number that is ten, and even the force are ten commandments, or else you were twelve when the priest says, one, two, three and showing the fingers , came to the last two must borrow from the clerk's hand. Now take the body and has all the things that sprout from the trunk, with arms, legs, head and penis are six, but seven for women, so I think that among the six is not your authors never been taken seriously except as a double of three, because it only works for men who have no seven, when they command and they prefer to see it as sacred number, forgetting that my boobs sticking out, but never mind. Otto - my god, we have no eight ... no, wait, if arms and legs do not count for one, but two, because of elbow and knee, we have eight major long bones that sballonzolano out, and take these eight plus the trunk and you have nine, then that if we put your head is ten. But always going around the body it leads out of all the numbers you want, think of the holes. "
" Holes? "
" Yes, your body has many holes? "
'Well' I was counting on "Eyes ears nose mouth ass, is eight."
"See Another reason that eight is a nice number. But I have nine! With the ninth And I'll come into the world, and that's why nine is more divine than eight! But you want an explanation of other recurring figures ? Want the anatomy of your menhir, which your authors are always talking about? is standing by day and lying down at night - even your little thing, no, do not tell me what it does at night, the fact is that labor law and rests lying down. And then the train is upright life, and is related with the sun, and the obelisk stands on end up like the trees, while the horizontal station and the night they sleep and then death, all love and standing stones, pyramids, Columns and no one loves balconies and balustrades. Have you ever heard of a cult of the archaic sacred railing? See? And because the body can not tell you, if you love a stone upright, even if you are in so many see it all, but if you love something they see only the horizontal ones in the front row and the other saying I push myself and not a pretty sight for a magical ceremony ... "
" But the rivers ... "
" Rivers is not because they are horizontal, but because it's in the water and do not want me explain the relationship between water and body ... Oh well, we like that, with this body, everyone, and for this we develop the same symbols to millions of miles away, to force all look alike, and then see that people with rooms in the head if they see the stove alchemist, full-close and warm inside, thinking of the belly of the mother giving the baby, and your only see the evil that Madonna is going to do the child and they think it is an allusion to the alchemist's stove. So they spent thousands of years searching for a message, and everything was already there, just looking at the mirror. "
" You tell me the truth. You are my Me, My Self, which is then seen by you. I want to discover all the secrets of the archetypes of the body. "That evening inaugurated the expression" doing archetypes "to indicate our moments of tenderness. While I have left to sleep Lia touched my shoulder. "I forgot," he said, "I'm pregnant."
I should listen to Lia. He spoke with the wisdom of one who knows where life is born [...]
I want to listen to a Lia. I know they'll be back soon
"Pim, there are the archetypes, is the body. Inside the belly is nice, because there the child grows, it puts your bird happy and everything goes down the food tastes good, and so are the beautiful and important cave, the ravine, the tunnel, the underground, and even the maze that is made like our good and holy tripe, and when someone has to invent something important it does come from there, why did you come from there too the day that you were born, and fertility is always a hole where something before it rots and then here is there a Chinese guy, a date, a baobab tree. But the top is better than down, because if you're upside down you are the blood to the head because your feet smell and my hair not because it is better to climb a tree to gather fruit finish ground to fatten the worms, because you rarely get hurt by touching the top (you have to be right in the attic) and usually you get hurt falling down , which is why the top is angelic and diabolical down. But as is also true what I said before on my tummy, are true and both, it's nice to bottom and inside, in a sense, and another is looking up and out, and there ' Mercury enters the spirit of contradiction and the universal. The fire keeps you warm and the cold makes you bronchopneumonia, especially if you are a clever than four years ago, and then the fire under mysterious, even why do you cook the chicken. But the cold keeps the same chicken and the fire if you touch it makes you a blister so big, so if you think one thing that has survived for millennia, like wisdom, you have to think on a mountain top (and we saw that is good), but in a cave (which is just as well) and the eternal cold of the Tibetan snow (which is fine). And if you want to know why the wisdom from the East and not from the Swiss Alps, is because the body of your ancestors in the morning when he awoke it was still dark, he looked to the east, hoping that this becomes the sun and not rain, Government thief .
"Yes, Mother."
"Certainly yes, my child. The sun is good because it is good for the body, and why has the good sense to reappear each day, then returns all that is good, not what goes and goes and who we have seen we have seen. The most convenient way to return from where it passed without redoing the same way twice is walking in circles. And since the only animal that is curled in a circle is the serpent, that's why so many cults and myths of the snake, because it is difficult to represent the return of the sun rolling a hippopotamus. Also, if you need to do a ceremony to summon the sun, you'll want to move in a circle, because if you move in a straight line away from home and the ceremony would be brief, and barks part of the circle is the structure is most convenient for a ritual, and so do those who ate fire in the squares, because everyone sees the same circle so that the person at the center, while if an entire tribe put in a straight line as a team of soldiers, the most would not see far, and that's why the circle and the cyclic motion and the return are fundamental to every religion and every ritual. "
" Yes mom. "
" Of course. And now for the magic numbers so fond of your authors. One is you're not two, one is that your affarino there, one is my affarina here and some are the nose and the heart and then see how many important things are one. And two are the eyes, ears, nostrils, my breasts and your balls, legs, arms and buttocks. Three is the most magical of all because our body does not know it, we do not have anything that is three things, and should be a mysterious number that we attribute to God, wherever we live. but if you think about it, I have one little thing and you have only one little thing - is' shut up and do spirit - and if we put these two together is Cosini out a new little thing and we become three. But then it takes a professor to find out that all peoples have ternary structures, Trinity, and the like? But religions were not the mica with the computer, it was all good people, that the purpose as they should, and all facilities are not a Trinitarian mystery, are the story of what you do, of what they did. But two arms and two legs are four, four and here is the same as a good number, especially if you think that animals have four legs and four legs are young children, known as the Sphinx. Five not talk about, are the fingers of the hand, and with two hands you have that other sacred number that is ten, and even the force are ten commandments, or else you were twelve when the priest says, one, two, three and showing the fingers , came to the last two must borrow from the clerk's hand. Now take the body and has all the things that sprout from the trunk, with arms, legs, head and penis are six, but seven for women, so I think that among the six is not your authors never been taken seriously except as a double of three, because it only works for men who have no seven, when they command and they prefer to see it as sacred number, forgetting that my boobs sticking out, but never mind. Otto - my god, we have no eight ... no, wait, if arms and legs do not count for one, but two, because of elbow and knee, we have eight major long bones that sballonzolano out, and take these eight plus the trunk and you have nine, then that if we put your head is ten. But always going around the body it leads out of all the numbers you want, think of the holes. "
" Holes? "
" Yes, your body has many holes? "
'Well' I was counting on "Eyes ears nose mouth ass, is eight."
"See Another reason that eight is a nice number. But I have nine! With the ninth And I'll come into the world, and that's why nine is more divine than eight! But you want an explanation of other recurring figures ? Want the anatomy of your menhir, which your authors are always talking about? is standing by day and lying down at night - even your little thing, no, do not tell me what it does at night, the fact is that labor law and rests lying down. And then the train is upright life, and is related with the sun, and the obelisk stands on end up like the trees, while the horizontal station and the night they sleep and then death, all love and standing stones, pyramids, Columns and no one loves balconies and balustrades. Have you ever heard of a cult of the archaic sacred railing? See? And because the body can not tell you, if you love a stone upright, even if you are in so many see it all, but if you love something they see only the horizontal ones in the front row and the other saying I push myself and not a pretty sight for a magical ceremony ... "
" But the rivers ... "
" Rivers is not because they are horizontal, but because it's in the water and do not want me explain the relationship between water and body ... Oh well, we like that, with this body, everyone, and for this we develop the same symbols to millions of miles away, to force all look alike, and then see that people with rooms in the head if they see the stove alchemist, full-close and warm inside, thinking of the belly of the mother giving the baby, and your only see the evil that Madonna is going to do the child and they think it is an allusion to the alchemist's stove. So they spent thousands of years searching for a message, and everything was already there, just looking at the mirror. "
" You tell me the truth. You are my Me, My Self, which is then seen by you. I want to discover all the secrets of the archetypes of the body. "That evening inaugurated the expression" doing archetypes "to indicate our moments of tenderness. While I have left to sleep Lia touched my shoulder. "I forgot," he said, "I'm pregnant."
I should listen to Lia. He spoke with the wisdom of one who knows where life is born [...]
I want to listen to a Lia. I know they'll be back soon
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Groping O Molesting Bus
Shipyard
100,525 stories of torment
If returns will be 100,500 beats per unit time.
100,525 stories of torment
If returns will be 100,500 beats per unit time.
Friday, March 7, 2008
Dvd/cd Rewritable Drive Model Lmu-713h
killyourbuddha @ 2008-03-07T20: 53:00
The arrival of spring, moves in me mixed feelings. To save me from madness, fortunately, there is still the mental masturbation. The latest adventure concerns a Borges, a scholar of my greatest systems has enjoyed to criticize during the past week.
failing to desire to make things flowing, I copy-paste the important pieces of the debate, which took place by email and sms.
The topic is "The Library of Borges is finite or infinite?"
"With a finite, albeit large, of information, you can not describe an infinite number of concepts.
Taking the simplest example, many combinations can give infinite concepts, think of such binary alphabet: 1 and 0. No matter how many combinations you can make sure you can not express any number if you do not have endless places to put the figures. If you say it enough Tell me what is the limit ... There will be a finite number of places where your reasoning allows to express infinite numbers, and infinite words, infinite-machine codes, etc. ... "
" But then he thinks the Peano axioms. Five finite strings of information can generate a "cycle, the successor function" all natural numbers (and therefore there any countable set). It does not matter if you have not mentioned, the information you have created the same, in a way perhaps more elegant than with the mere "recitation" of the sequence of numbers. If desired, every piece of information can be made as close you want the continuous, though now I can cut her arms talking about qubits and the like. "
" Each element has a successor. So there is no limit. Try to define the library with something similar to the five Peano axioms. It does not hold, Peano does not limit the length of "figures" (wlog since we can speak of numbers, but the discussion can be extended with little effort), which instead Borges ago, I think even elegant ... "
To give you an example, take a circle and its radius. Detach from a corner radius that it is an irrational multiple of 2 \\ pi: for sure, sooner or later will touch all points of the compass, but does not exit. You have to go that route for an infinite time, just because an irrational number is aperiodic. Gambling: somewhere in the decimal expansion of \\ pi there is a string in binary, in easdecimale or any other alphabet contains letters of decoding the entire Library. And advancing space for as many libraries similar or different from countless others for a single letter, or different at every point, or resulting from disruption to the order of the letters ... "
"In my opinion nothing to do with you ... You are true examples of the continuous, but remember that the Library is, by definition, consists of a set of discrete elements (mind you, discreet even finite cardinality ). If anything to be infinite (and periodic) is the sequence of Libraries are the same, I guess I heavily heavily stoic but also elegant. I mean, I might try using Cantor's diagonal argument show that there is at least one book outside of what I thought were "all" books. But it does not work because you did not book-length infinite .. suppose you have listed all the books. You'll then have the opportunity to "godelizzare" all B (the Library) by assigning each book a certain natural number, no matter that the second rule. At that point, however, realize that numbers are finite. If I choose the number (ie the book, given that I built Fichissima bijection) which differs from the first book in the first letter, the second book in the second letter, the third in the third and so on, I get a book that is not in ... no, wait, we're sure! Just who is in all those books that have an index greater than K, where K = c * r * p (c are the characters, the lines r, p pages ... should be around 900,000 if I remember bad), books that have every right to exist and which, when assembled, I'll bet my copy of De Ludo Alea, the book contains different from all K. So no nonsense, you can actually enumerate all the books.
See, the problem I think is more logical and analytical, combinatorial or algebraic. You could give an interpretation "bibliophile" of Godel's theorem? And most importantly, how to define objectively a "concept"? As I told you the natural numbers are constructible by enumeration (brute method, but rich in information) or axiomatization (using information-poor but also concise and elegant) ... the two formulations are equivalent or not?
[Pause, weariness of the contestants]
"My criticism is not on the finiteness of the alphabet, but on the books ... If the definition of the concept is not well placed, then we are metaphysics and the value given the truth of words is entirely arbitrary. But if we in the realm of spsotiamo concretoe associate with the term "concept" to mean "information" then gives me all right. Except, perhaps, but I've just thought, if the finiteness of the universe imply that the information and concepts can be expressed. "
" Exactly what is the thesis of Borges. Finiteness of the concepts back to the eternal condemnation = = sadness because we are players in a game rules unknown to warp minds inconceivable to us that are scrambling to find the Book and the keeper but his prey of their mortality. But go ahead, I'm interested. "
" The question now becomes physical. The universe seen expanding at the speed of light, then a nap is finished considerrarlo hazardous. In addition, space is not quantized. If it were it might spin, but ONLY say that as long as the library itself is not a new concept of its own. "
" On the quantization of space I do not comment. But to say that the universe expands admit that is an implicit "the universe is finite, giving the word universe the value of" being organized and responsive to laws of general relativity. " We are organized in a magma bubbles chaotic, is a very elegant way to see the universe, to think in terms of random foam. Instead it is the last interesting concept. There is a book about the Library and describes it? There is a book about the book that describes the library? Certainly yes, but I do not think that this alone is enough to make it down the finiteness. The problem is the end: generalize. If A is an alphabet made from k symbols, the possible information strings of infinite length are obviously infinite (countable). But if we want only the combinations p symbols long, the question is more intricate! Will be, like, combinations with repetition of symbols taken k groups of p strings ... But one aspect is that Borges does not elaborate on the interdependence between the symbols: of course there are books that refer to other books, but what about books about topics that can not drain completely in a string of p symbols? They are obviously allowed paraphrases, summaries or notations that shortening the exposure, but to what extent? Is there a "quantum of information" so small or so primitive that it can not be attributed to any other entity? There is a book about the subject in x p characters, its existence implies that of a book about in x p -1 characters and replaces the w ith a letter to the case (indeed, there are 21, one for each letter as possible). The same reasoning leads to understand how there can be a book about x in p -2 characters, and 21 * 21 books that occupy the last two posts for more. And so on, but I wonder, can legally reverse the induction far as to say that there is a book about of x in A character and uses p -1 characters to say more? The next step would be an absurd dialectic, a book which exhausts a subject in 0 characters! Not to mention the fact that if this were possible, every book is about any subject, would be enough to build some kind of sequence (and you know this is always possible) that starts with a good book and get the book arbitrary j -th, and justifies the fact that a book that consists only of a series of methodical mjhkdl speak, in our view, the face of God. is loses any kind of logic convention, everything about everything and nothing. Surprising. "
" I think I've reached a topic that exhausts the question. The library expands, because it must include the idea of a book in its entirety without that book. It must contain the following in turn the concept of wholeness of the library before him. And so on, ad infinitum, the books are endless, as each book must be different from others and that for every book that speaks of the totality of s books there is one who speaks for all of s +1 books. "
here ... did not know what to say and I retired to think, but the question remains. The question is really low? What is the final hypothesis in the last note of the story, that of the "silky handbook" endless pages of infinitely thin? applications are based on the finiteness? There is a unique way to define "concepts" and "information" that could help the discussion? What is also of ; supposed periodic structure of the library?
willing to turn the question, the friend who supported me has been "spent" enough but I still want to deepen.
The arrival of spring, moves in me mixed feelings. To save me from madness, fortunately, there is still the mental masturbation. The latest adventure concerns a Borges, a scholar of my greatest systems has enjoyed to criticize during the past week.
failing to desire to make things flowing, I copy-paste the important pieces of the debate, which took place by email and sms.
The topic is "The Library of Borges is finite or infinite?"
"With a finite, albeit large, of information, you can not describe an infinite number of concepts.
Taking the simplest example, many combinations can give infinite concepts, think of such binary alphabet: 1 and 0. No matter how many combinations you can make sure you can not express any number if you do not have endless places to put the figures. If you say it enough Tell me what is the limit ... There will be a finite number of places where your reasoning allows to express infinite numbers, and infinite words, infinite-machine codes, etc. ... "
" But then he thinks the Peano axioms. Five finite strings of information can generate a "cycle, the successor function" all natural numbers (and therefore there any countable set). It does not matter if you have not mentioned, the information you have created the same, in a way perhaps more elegant than with the mere "recitation" of the sequence of numbers. If desired, every piece of information can be made as close you want the continuous, though now I can cut her arms talking about qubits and the like. "
" Each element has a successor. So there is no limit. Try to define the library with something similar to the five Peano axioms. It does not hold, Peano does not limit the length of "figures" (wlog since we can speak of numbers, but the discussion can be extended with little effort), which instead Borges ago, I think even elegant ... "
To give you an example, take a circle and its radius. Detach from a corner radius that it is an irrational multiple of 2 \\ pi: for sure, sooner or later will touch all points of the compass, but does not exit. You have to go that route for an infinite time, just because an irrational number is aperiodic. Gambling: somewhere in the decimal expansion of \\ pi there is a string in binary, in easdecimale or any other alphabet contains letters of decoding the entire Library. And advancing space for as many libraries similar or different from countless others for a single letter, or different at every point, or resulting from disruption to the order of the letters ... "
"In my opinion nothing to do with you ... You are true examples of the continuous, but remember that the Library is, by definition, consists of a set of discrete elements (mind you, discreet even finite cardinality ). If anything to be infinite (and periodic) is the sequence of Libraries are the same, I guess I heavily heavily stoic but also elegant. I mean, I might try using Cantor's diagonal argument show that there is at least one book outside of what I thought were "all" books. But it does not work because you did not book-length infinite .. suppose you have listed all the books. You'll then have the opportunity to "godelizzare" all B (the Library) by assigning each book a certain natural number, no matter that the second rule. At that point, however, realize that numbers are finite. If I choose the number (ie the book, given that I built Fichissima bijection) which differs from the first book in the first letter, the second book in the second letter, the third in the third and so on, I get a book that is not in ... no, wait, we're sure! Just who is in all those books that have an index greater than K, where K = c * r * p (c are the characters, the lines r, p pages ... should be around 900,000 if I remember bad), books that have every right to exist and which, when assembled, I'll bet my copy of De Ludo Alea, the book contains different from all K. So no nonsense, you can actually enumerate all the books.
See, the problem I think is more logical and analytical, combinatorial or algebraic. You could give an interpretation "bibliophile" of Godel's theorem? And most importantly, how to define objectively a "concept"? As I told you the natural numbers are constructible by enumeration (brute method, but rich in information) or axiomatization (using information-poor but also concise and elegant) ... the two formulations are equivalent or not?
[Pause, weariness of the contestants]
"My criticism is not on the finiteness of the alphabet, but on the books ... If the definition of the concept is not well placed, then we are metaphysics and the value given the truth of words is entirely arbitrary. But if we in the realm of spsotiamo concretoe associate with the term "concept" to mean "information" then gives me all right. Except, perhaps, but I've just thought, if the finiteness of the universe imply that the information and concepts can be expressed. "
" Exactly what is the thesis of Borges. Finiteness of the concepts back to the eternal condemnation = = sadness because we are players in a game rules unknown to warp minds inconceivable to us that are scrambling to find the Book and the keeper but his prey of their mortality. But go ahead, I'm interested. "
" The question now becomes physical. The universe seen expanding at the speed of light, then a nap is finished considerrarlo hazardous. In addition, space is not quantized. If it were it might spin, but ONLY say that as long as the library itself is not a new concept of its own. "
" On the quantization of space I do not comment. But to say that the universe expands admit that is an implicit "the universe is finite, giving the word universe the value of" being organized and responsive to laws of general relativity. " We are organized in a magma bubbles chaotic, is a very elegant way to see the universe, to think in terms of random foam. Instead it is the last interesting concept. There is a book about the Library and describes it? There is a book about the book that describes the library? Certainly yes, but I do not think that this alone is enough to make it down the finiteness. The problem is the end: generalize. If A is an alphabet made from k symbols, the possible information strings of infinite length are obviously infinite (countable). But if we want only the combinations p symbols long, the question is more intricate! Will be, like, combinations with repetition of symbols taken k groups of p strings ... But one aspect is that Borges does not elaborate on the interdependence between the symbols: of course there are books that refer to other books, but what about books about topics that can not drain completely in a string of p symbols? They are obviously allowed paraphrases, summaries or notations that shortening the exposure, but to what extent? Is there a "quantum of information" so small or so primitive that it can not be attributed to any other entity? There is a book about the subject in x p characters, its existence implies that of a book about in x p -1 characters and replaces the w ith a letter to the case (indeed, there are 21, one for each letter as possible). The same reasoning leads to understand how there can be a book about x in p -2 characters, and 21 * 21 books that occupy the last two posts for more. And so on, but I wonder, can legally reverse the induction far as to say that there is a book about of x in A character and uses p -1 characters to say more? The next step would be an absurd dialectic, a book which exhausts a subject in 0 characters! Not to mention the fact that if this were possible, every book is about any subject, would be enough to build some kind of sequence (and you know this is always possible) that starts with a good book and get the book arbitrary j -th, and justifies the fact that a book that consists only of a series of methodical mjhkdl speak, in our view, the face of God. is loses any kind of logic convention, everything about everything and nothing. Surprising. "
" I think I've reached a topic that exhausts the question. The library expands, because it must include the idea of a book in its entirety without that book. It must contain the following in turn the concept of wholeness of the library before him. And so on, ad infinitum, the books are endless, as each book must be different from others and that for every book that speaks of the totality of s books there is one who speaks for all of s +1 books. "
here ... did not know what to say and I retired to think, but the question remains. The question is really low? What is the final hypothesis in the last note of the story, that of the "silky handbook" endless pages of infinitely thin? applications are based on the finiteness? There is a unique way to define "concepts" and "information" that could help the discussion? What is also of ; supposed periodic structure of the library?
willing to turn the question, the friend who supported me has been "spent" enough but I still want to deepen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)